Teknologi Tepat Guna

Product Description

The EOS 5D Mark IV camera builds on the powerful legacy of the 5D series, offering amazing refinements in image quality, performance and versatility. Canon’s commitment to imaging excellence is the soul of the EOS 5D Mark IV. Wedding and portrait photographers, nature and landscape shooters, as well as creative videographers will appreciate the brilliance and power that the EOS 5D Mark IV delivers.

---

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #98 in Camera & Photo
• Color: Black
• Brand: Canon
• Model: 1483C002
• Released on: 2016-09-08
• Aspect ratio: Unknown
• Dimensions: 4.60" h x 5.90" w x 3.00" l, 1.76 pounds
• Battery type: Lithium Ion
• Display size: 3.2

Features

• 30.4 MP full-frame CMOS sensor for versatile shooting
• Up to 7.0 frames per second continuous shooting speed
• 61-point AF system with 41 cross-points for expanded vertical coverage
• ISO range 100-32000 with 50-102400 expansion
• 4K video recording at 30p or 24p and in-camera still frame grab of 8.8MP images
• Touch-screen LCD monitor

From the Manufacturer

---

Customer Reviews

Most helpful customer reviews
194 of 216 people found the following review helpful.
14 Reasons to buy and 6 reasons not to buy
By Painter of stories
The Canon 5D Mark IV is one of the most anticipated cameras. Mark III users and other camera enthusiasts are pondering if they should make the upgrade or jump ship. My review here is based on just a few days of tests and I will updated this review as I continue. Now, a bit about my background, I shoot weddings for a living after retiring from more than 40 years of running my other businesses. I have watched every Mark IV Youtube videos available before its release so that I would know exactly what to look for upon receiving the camera. Here is the good, the bad and the ugly. I purchased this camera from B&H so it won’t show that I own it.
1. 30.4 MP full-frame provides the ideal file size for wedding photographers who have to process thousands of photos. The image was large enough for cropping but not too large to slow down my workflow. However there is a better choice for landscape photographers, the 5DSR and Nikon D810 with higher resolution.
2. Seven frames per second continuous shooting speed. Buffer does not get filled up if I shoot jpg but maxed out at 21 frames for raw. Extra frame over the Mark III is nice, because you may just miss that first kiss. The speed is more than enough for weddings. However for sports shooter, the 1Dx Mark II would be a better choice.
3. Focus. This is the most important feature for my application. It has the same 61-point AF system with 41 cross-points but with expanded vertical coverage compared to the Mark III. I don’t see much usage for the vertical coverage, may be more horizontal coverage. In low light the mark IV focuses faster than the Mark III with higher hit rate which is another big reason for Mark III users to upgrade. In live view, the Dual Pixel focus speed is much faster than Mark III which still uses contrast detection. This works well for photo as well as video. It is very intelligent and tracks quite well even the subject’s face is turned away. Dual pixel is accomplished when each pixel in the sensor is split in half, capturing a left and a right image. These images are processed and compared in nanoseconds to attain focus. The Mark IV algorism is superior to just face detection. It can track object, for example it can follow the bride's purse. However it is always going to be slower to focus than spot focus. Dual pixel AF comes in extremely handy and that alone is worth the upgrade. This is something the A7Rii has but the A7Sii is lacking. In live view, the focus area select is limited to 3 options instead of 7, track, spot and expanded. It can be changed with the "Q" button only in live view mode and can not be adjusted with the AF area select button. IMO, Canon's strength is on focus speed, despite of how much I like the IQ on my A7Rii, it has less focus hit rate on action shots than Mark III or IV. The Mark III and IV will continue to be wedding and action photographers's favorite tool.
4. ISO range 100-32000 with 50-102400 expansion. ISO noise is improved from the Mark III by about one and half stop. Usable at 6400 to 12800. I noticed there are less color noise than the Mark III and the grains are finer due to a higher resolution sensor. This is really helpful for low light shots which require a faster lens than F2.8. Even though the ISO has improved from the Mark III, a reason to buy but it still has more banding and noise than the A7Rii. The A7Sii and A7S are still the kings of the low light monsters.
5. Touch-screen LCD monitor. Finally Canon makes it easier for us photographers and you can use both the buttons and the touch-screen simultaneously. Yes, there are certain menu that can be navigated quicker with the dials so it is brilliant you can do both. There is also a confirmation tone after you have tapped the item. The screen is higher res than Mark III and as sensitive and accurate as my iphone. Reviewing photos on camera has never been so easy. Scroll, pinch, swipe and tap, it is so fast to navigate, again a feature D810, A7Sii and A7Rii lacks. Resolution on the screen is 1,620,000 vs Nikon D810 at 1,229,000 and Mark III at 1,040,000.
6. Dual Pixel Raw. With the dual images generated from the split pixel, Canon cleverly processes them as Dual Pixel Raw allowing post micro focus adjustments. This is good to have for wedding and portrait photographers, as you can fix minor focus problem in post at appx. half inch focal range . However, Lightroom does not support this feature at the moment so the workflow is painfully slow using DPP Application. Adobe has announced that they will support Dual Pixel Raw so this is a temporary problem. DPR perhaps is one of the great advancements over Nikon and Sony.
7. Weather sealing should be improved but it is hard to prove. But with Canon’s legendary quality, I believe they did borrow the technique from the 7D.
8. DR (Dynamic Range) has been greatly improved. The shadow has a lot less noise than previous models. Increase latitude to push shadow for under exposed area and the ability to retain detail over the 5D Mark III and 6D is truly incredible. Canon's claim on increase DR is 100% true, the difference is so obvious that it makes me hesitates pulling my favorite Mark III out of the bag. DR is still a bit shy from A7Rii but greatly improved from the Mark III and 6D, it can now compete with any full frame head to head. If I am buying a still camera for just the DR, the A7Rii will be the choice but the Mark IV is just so much better in so many other arenas, making it my go-to camera.
9. Wifi. Uploading photos to phone to share in social media has never been easier and I am glad Canon has finally caught up with the trend.
10. Improve handling. The grip is more comfortable than the Mark III. I have medium size hands, I own and tried many cameras, the Mark IV has the most comfortable grip for me. The rubber has been improved from the Mark III. It is more secure and comfortable to hold.
11. Third party gear. The popularity of the Canon lens system makes owning this camera a dream as it has created an extremely strong third party support. For example the Metabone adapter which works on the Canon lenses, allowing me to share the glass and to use the Sony A7Sii as my main video camera and Canon 5D Mark IV as my still camera. The combination of these two cameras is perhaps the best system to use for weddings. Despite of how much I like Nikon's IQ, I could not share its lenses with Sony using the popular Metabone adapter. This is the main reason I purchased this camera. I want to make it clear that I am not associated or paid by any parties for this review.
12. Canon added the extra AF area selection button which can be used for quick ISO adjustment. Under CUSTOM CONTROL on the last icon at the bottom you can set this button to adjust ISO together with the front dial. This extra button makes adjusting ISO on the fly a single step process. I change ISO quite often between indoor and outdoor during the reception so this will come in quite handy. Basically Canon has added a third wheel for the ISO similar to that of the A7Rii.
13. HDR video. I can save blown out highlights shot in this mode for about 1 to 2 stops. However, it will only shoot in 30FPS at 1080P because it actually shoots in 60FPS and combine the 2 frames in HDR. This mode is not available in 4K since the limit is 30FPS.
14. Multi Shot NR. In this mode the camera takes 4 quick consecutive shots and process them to reduce noise. This allows you to shot in much higher ISO with noticeable improvement in IQ but remember to keep your hands steady (no tripod needed) and it only works in jpeg. How is this different than stopping down 2 stops on the shutter speed? The Mark IV takes 4 images separately, process and align them to produce less noise and motion blurs compared to stopping down the shutter. When I run out of options in low light, I would switch from RAW to JPG and change to this mode. You will find it very handy.

Reasons not to buy
1. LPF- Low Path Filter. Canon could easily remove this filter but chose not to. My take on this, is that Canon is very conservative and they chose to sacrifice sharpness over Moire. On my A7Rii I do occasionally see Moire, for example power lines so this is a preference and should not be judged as a defect. Another possibility is that Canon’s sensor just isn’t good enough to handle Moire without the LPF. This is where Nikon and Sony shine, their IQ has higher DR and sharpness.
2. 4K video recording is perhaps the worst feature Canon has added to this camera. Motion jpeg creates a warping appx. 240GB file size in just one hour of record time. Also due to the 1.74x crop, I was unable to shoot wide even with a 16-35mm, not to mention the less than okay low light quality. On the up side the Mark IV allows you to frame grab at 8.8MP which gives me better IQ compared to frame grabbed from A7Sii. My assistant can now shoot backup photos at 30fps continuously in critical moments. However, Canon should have given us another codec option with better compression and not worry about cannibalizing their pro video line. This near sight leaves the door open for Sony and Nikon. Canon, bring out your best gun before the enemies engulf you. The way Sony is progressing, I estimate Canon and Nikon's monopoly on pro camera market will not last more than a decade.
3. No Tilt screen. Some may wonder why Canon didn’t put this in the Mark IV. My guess is that the tilt screen makes the camera less rugged, harder to seal and both Canon and Nikon want to make their pro gear bullet proof. The toughness of Canon gear is one of the main reasons I use it exclusively for weddings. It’s sad to say that my Sony A7Rii gave me a “Camera Error” message in just a few months of light usage (I couldn’t fix it even after doing a hardware reset) and my Mark III lasted for years. Do I wish for the tilt screen? Canon and Nikon both should listen carefully, I want the tilt screen even if I have to sacrifice some durability and weather resistance.
4. Weight, it is only a few grams lighter than the Mark III but still much heavier than the GH4 and A7Rii. A reason to go mirrorless instead of DSLR. If I travel, I would carry only the A7Rii (not even bring the A7Sii which is only good for video) as I am not a pack rat.
5. The memory card is outdated and slow Canon should have used Cfast.
6. No EVF. EVF has many advantages operating in the dark. You can see what the sensor sees instead of everything pitch dark coming from the mirror which makes composition and exposure harder. With EVF, if you are under exposed by not paying attention to the meter, you will immediately notice and make the adjustment. Here is a really funny idea, Canon can add an EVF next to the current view finder as it will be extremely useful for shooting video under the bright sun. It will look totally funny though so I don't think that would ever happen. Most would agree without the EVF, the DSLR will be not be able to compete with Mirrorless in video features. This may be the main reason that Canon is trying to separate still from video on their DSLR line up and steer video shooters to their cinema line . I am not paid by Canon, Sony or any third party. IMO, Sony is better on video and Canon is better on photos.

Important update: As of 9/24/2016 the raw files from Mark IV is supported in Lightroom CC but not in LR 5. No older versions of LR get any updates when there is a new version available. You can use the newest version of the Free Adobe DNG converter Ver 9.7 to convert the native RAW files to DNG's that LR 5 can read.

In conclusion, the photo quality of the Mark IV has been improved remarkably from the Mark III but if you want to shoot video, this is definitely a “no buy” and I would only use it as a backup. Canon is facing some really competitions on DSLR sensor technology but it is still able to keep up on the photography side. It has to either heavily invest in another mirrorless line or to follow Nikon's foot print and use Sony's sensor for the Mark V. It's not Canon does not have the technology to make better sensor, just that it is unable to drive cost down to compete in the DSLR market. Imaging the Mark V with Sony’s video specifications and Canon’s brilliant stills technology. May be Canon is too arrogant to approach Sony or it is trying to over protect their cinema lines. The Mark IV in video application has inadequate codec selection (biggest killer is file size), over cropping which affects not only focal length but also ISO performance. The only advantage is its dual pixel AF but the cons out weights the pro for video. However It is one of the most carefully thought out camera for stills. For now, as a photographer, if you own Nikon, stay with Nikon, the Mark IV features are evolution not revolution and they are still not worth the switch, if you have Sony keep it for video and buy this for photos. If you are a photographer (not videographer) this is a no brainer and I recommend a strong buy, especially if you already have the Canon glass as there is nothing better out there. IMHO, the Mark IV as of 2016 is still the best stills camera when taken everything into consideration. I gave it a 5 stars despite of its video shortcomings which can be easily complimented with other great video cameras.
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful.
The Mark IV is another superb iteration of the Canon 5D line that hits many of the upgrade checkboxes
By CalBear '01
I'm writing this review as a hobbyist rather than professional photographer (that is, that sells photographs for a living). My first 5D was the Mark II, and I've used the Mark III for over 3 years myself, and instead of going through all the nitty-gritty of the Mark IV which you find elsewhere, I'm going to speak to mostly to the differences I've found in my day-to-day experiences and whether it's worth the upgrade for the hobbyist.

First off, coming from the Mark III, the IV on the outside is very much similar, and you could mistake them at a glance. The differences include a slightly rougher cap on top of the new Mark IV body (where the Canon brand label sits) whereas the Mark III had the same material extended from the body over the cap. Perhaps it's a new material housing to play more nicely with the GPS/Wi-Fi? There's also new switch to toggle face detection in Live View mode in the back. The mode switch dial is also the newer Canon styles that bumps up a bit rather than the more flatter design of the Mark III. Otherwise, for those coming from the Mark III, you can feel right at home picking up the Mark IV for the first time.

In terms of shooting, I personally find the viewfinder to be brighter on the Mark IV than on the Mark III. This could just be my units and maybe a bit of dust on the Mark III, but using the same lenses, I find the Mark IV viewfinder a joy to use, much like the Mark III's, and even a shade brighter! The new Dual Pixel AF works as advertised, and is much faster than the Mark III at face detection and toggling between different subjects - a big improvement here. The back review LCD is also a touchscreen now, which allows for your standard panning of shots as well as pinch-and-zoom. Although many shooters will still opt for the familiar mechanical buttons, as a hobbyist that shares the camera for others to shoot as well as reviews them on the spot with many moms with Android/iPhones, it's so much easier now to have them use the touchscreen to flip from photo to photo, and to zoom in and out to see themselves and whether the shot is worth keeping ;)

In terms of photo quality, the highlight is the improved dynamic range of the new 30MP sensor. Although improved from the Mark II to the Mark III, I see a marked improvement for the Mark IV. Pushing exposure on underexposed shots with the same ISO produces less banding on the same shots with the Mark III. Although Canon is still behind Nikon in this area, I'm happy to see improvements in this area. Auto-focus at lower light levels at the center point is also improved, so that helps with getting those low light shots as well. As for overall crispness and quality of the shots (which of course, depends very much on the lens itself), I found photos were very similar on the Mark IV, which is not in anyway a let down given I thought the Mark III was overall excellent in terms of stills quality.

Also as a hobbyist with a simple Lightroom workflow, I still have Lightroom 5. With Adobe's latest Camera Raw 9.7, Adobe now supports the Mark IV, but you'll need the newest Lightroom 6 or Lightroom CC, which is another cost to add to your upgrade tally if you don't already have those versions and plan to use Lightroom. Also, although Adobe will enable editing of the new Dual Pixel RAW format in Lightroom, it looks like, at least for now (as of late September 2016), it doesn't support any making micro-adjustments in focus that can be done in DPP. I find that it's useful when shooting with fast primes like the Canon 50 f/1.2L where small adjustments can help you hit focus.

Overall, another superb iteration of the Canon 5D line that hits many of the upgrade checkboxes, most particular in the area of dynamic range. I'll update my review as I've gotten more behind-the-lens time with the Mark IV, and in particular, video shooting. So, is the upgrade worth it for Mark III owners? I would say for those of you shooting in more low light settings, the upgrades could make the additional cost worth it for you. However, for many others, given that photo quality improvement from the Mark III is not revolutionary, I would say it may not be at the current MSRP for Mark III owners; maybe wait for the next Black Friday sale to bring the price down a bit. Also, having used the Mark II as well myself, for those Mark II owners itching for the next big thing, with two generations of technology under its belt, the Mark IV is a worthy upgrade that you don't have to worry looking back on!
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful.
Improved ISO and dynamic range performance.
By Abysal
I have been waiting for a camera that performs well in low light and one that can also achieve good dynamic range. Having already invested into the canon system over the last several years, meant I would not switch to Sony or Nikon, even though they both have good performing cameras. My main shooter has been a 7D Mark II for the past couple of years.

Pros:
- Great low light performance. For me, easily acceptable images up to ISO 16000. Even ISO 25600, but it gets muddy.
- Dynamic range is very improved over my 7D Mark II & newer 760D; I can really boost those shadows several stops without added noise.
- 30MP sensor shows a lot of detail.
- Touch screen is awesome! I find my self missing it when I switch to the 7D Mark II.
- Focus speed is fast, but to be honest the 7D Mark II focus seems just as fast.
- Area focus zones, zone switch button, and general design carried over from the 7D Mark II - awesome!
- Focus point lights up in red.
- Exposure meter in manual mode at the bottom of the view finder, where it should be! 7D Mark II has this on the right side of the view finder.
- More customization of button functions, allows quick switch from One Shot to Servo
- GPS works, and works well, can leave on without battery drain. 7D Mark II took several min for it to begin logging.
- Over all build and sealing seems as good as the 7D Mark II.
- 1080p video @ 60p looks great! Does not overheat when shooting 4K.
- Takes same cards & batteries as the 7D Mark II.

Cons:
- Focus points are not far enough out, my 7D Mark II has a better distribution. I found I do more focus and re-compose with the 5D Mark IV.
- Lack of articulating screen. I think this could of been added while still maintaining the tank build of the camera.
- 4K video MJPEG codec - it has some benefits, but honestly the file size is too big to work with quickly. Sony Vegas chokes, but will work.
- No HDMI 4K out.
- Some lenses need peripheral illumination correction turned off for jpeg. Since it's a global setting, I just left it off. I shoot raw anyway.
- Battery life seems to be on average around 500-600 shots, I thought it should be closer to 800.

Overall I'm very pleased with the camera. I love the canon controls & design, as well as the auto ISO setup compared to Nikon. I'm not heavy into video, but I plan on mostly shooting 1080p, and I'll leave the 4K to my lx-100, so the lack of better 4K capabilities is only a minor annoyance. My old 550D would overheat when shooting 1080p, and the Sony cameras also overheat on 4K, so far the 5D Mark IV has been working reliably. On the stills side, the camera performs great, the sensor provides sharp images with very nice details, even though there is a low pass AA filter - good glass helps; like the 85mm f1.8 from Tamron :)
See all 39 customer reviews...